<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Painfully slow CentOS system</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/06/painfully-slow-centos-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/06/painfully-slow-centos-system/</link>
	<description>This blog is here to stay</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:09:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raposatul</title>
		<link>http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/06/painfully-slow-centos-system/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Raposatul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nirkabel.org/?p=72#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Thank you Adryan, had this problem with some SATA HDDs in mirror 1 software RAID.

All I did was : &quot;Native Mode Operation&quot; set to  &quot;Serial ATA&quot; (it had the default BIOS option).

I had to recompile the kernel with SATA support because it was an old Slackware :)  But for the new distros you shouldn&#039;t need to do that.

You saved the (many) &quot;dayS&quot;, thank you :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Adryan, had this problem with some SATA HDDs in mirror 1 software RAID.</p>
<p>All I did was : &#8220;Native Mode Operation&#8221; set to  &#8220;Serial ATA&#8221; (it had the default BIOS option).</p>
<p>I had to recompile the kernel with SATA support because it was an old Slackware <img src='http://blog.nirkabel.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   But for the new distros you shouldn&#8217;t need to do that.</p>
<p>You saved the (many) &#8220;dayS&#8221;, thank you <img src='http://blog.nirkabel.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/06/painfully-slow-centos-system/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Andryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nirkabel.org/?p=72#comment-212</guid>
		<description>AHA, yes.. Good point. Thanks for pointing this out. :)
I didn&#039;t consider that scenario when I wrote that post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AHA, yes.. Good point. Thanks for pointing this out. <img src='http://blog.nirkabel.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I didn&#8217;t consider that scenario when I wrote that post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas</title>
		<link>http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/06/painfully-slow-centos-system/comment-page-1/#comment-211</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 17:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nirkabel.org/?p=72#comment-211</guid>
		<description>&lt;q cite=&quot;&quot;&gt;I didn’t create RAID 1 for swap partition because it is useless&lt;/q&gt;

What you&#039;re doing, is making your other RAID 1 useless. If you reach your memory level and begin to use swap space, all thoose applications using swap space will segfault when the swap disk dies. You could potentially crash your whole machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><q cite="">I didn’t create RAID 1 for swap partition because it is useless</q></p>
<p>What you&#8217;re doing, is making your other RAID 1 useless. If you reach your memory level and begin to use swap space, all thoose applications using swap space will segfault when the swap disk dies. You could potentially crash your whole machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.nirkabel.org/2008/12/06/painfully-slow-centos-system/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 16:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nirkabel.org/?p=72#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Thank you SO much for this article. My sync speeds were only 3000kb/sec and after this fix they are 100000kb/sec+. i knew something was wrong with a dual core processor with 4gb ram hardly responding to keystrokes. Thanks so much!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SO much for this article. My sync speeds were only 3000kb/sec and after this fix they are 100000kb/sec+. i knew something was wrong with a dual core processor with 4gb ram hardly responding to keystrokes. Thanks so much!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
